Aaron wrote:
David wrote:
One can take a view on UAC but it is very, very wrong that VRPC forces the decision.
That's a very silly statement and demonstrates quite clearly that you haven't taken a blind bit of notice of what I've said to you.
I don't think it's a silly statement.
It is an inditement of an, in many ways excellent, piece of software that it requires its users to configure their systems in one, specific, VA-dictated way. Personally, I had a choice about upgrading to Vista and I did so in full knowledge of this weakness of VRPC so I'm not complaining, directly
. However, I can imagine plenty of cases where the decision won't be in people's hands (e.g. it's pretty hard already to buy a new PC without Vista).
Quote:
UAC contains a number of features, these are not independent, they are all or none, which is not an ideal situation.
The part of UAC you are refering to is the VirtualStore.
Is there a reason why VRPC can't behave like other Windows apps and store the user-editable bits of its configuration in the
Users/<username>/AppData structure?
[snip]
Quote:
This can be "circumvented" by moving the VirtualAcorn HardDisc4 to the users Documents folder
This seems like a sensible default setup, in any case. HardDisc4 is going to contain lots of end-user documents (and no Windows executables!) and therefore fits more comfortably into the "documents" structure than the "programs" structure.
Quote:
Since then work has been progressing on the PC version(s) of VRPC and a number of new components are in Beta.
This is excellent news
I sincerely hope mouse scrolling and pointer-synchronisation are going to be re-instated
Elsewhere, David wrote:
Yes I do, to answer the OP's questions, "Has anyone else encountered it? Is there a solution?".
Thanks, that's appreciated.
Cheers,
Adam